Independent public-interest researchEvidence dates shown with sources
Tonight · October 20Please donate.
Town hall tonight · 6:30–8:30 p.m. Central · In person or on Zoom
Public records · Resident action · Bastrop County

A 1,326 MW gas-turbine proposal does not belong in the middle of this community.

Pacifico's August air application describes 48 natural-gas turbines across six model families beside thousands of existing homes, schools and childcare sites. Lost Pines Watch turns the public record into facts residents can verify, meetings they can attend, and specific actions they can take.

Our conclusion: Bastrop County should withhold discretionary approvals, endorsements, and infrastructure assistance, and Pacifico should remove the utility-scale fossil plant or seek a more suitable industrial location with fewer community receptors, adequate fire and water infrastructure, and a fully disclosed permit record.
Real thermal drone footage · Not a rendering

Does Bastrop County need this in our backyard?

Floodlight News recorded this January 2026 thermal view above xAI's gas-turbine plant in Southaven, Mississippi. One data-center complex is served by rows of hot stacks and exhaust plumes visible across the yard.

Animated thermal drone footage looking down on a gas-turbine yard with hot exhaust plumes rising from rows of turbines
Credit: Floodlight News. This is not Pacifico or a prediction of Cedar Creek. Thermal footage shows the existence, heat, movement, and collective scale of exhaust; it does not measure pollutant concentrations.
Only have two minutes?

Get the strongest case and the clearest next steps.

The short brief separates the essential facts from the unanswered questions—and turns both into specific asks for county, state, and school-district decision-makers.

Read the 2-minute brief
Latest published update · October 20, 2026

Tonight: Cedar Creek Town Hall and Zoom Access

Join us tonight, 6:30–8:30 p.m. Central, at Lost Pines Pickleball Club or on Zoom. Zoom access graciously provided by the League of Independent Voters of Texas.

Read and share this update
The place matters

The filed perimeter is surrounded by an existing community

These privacy-safe GIS counts measure from Pacifico’s filed project boundary. They do not publish resident names, addresses, ownership, or submissions.

Inspect the map
854anonymous residential sites within 1 mile
2,247anonymous residential sites within 2 miles
5,701anonymous residential sites within 3 miles
17mapped school / childcare entries within about 3 miles
7 / 395recorded ESD station sites / square miles served

The drought layer retrieves the U.S. Drought Monitor’s latest available weekly polygons and dates. Drought conditions change; consult the dated map layer. Station locations and district lines do not prove staffing, apparatus, fire-water, response time, or industrial-fire capability.

The decision case

Why approval should be withheld

This is an explicit public-interest position grounded in the present record—not a claim that every unresolved risk has already been proven.

Explore
01

Homes and schools are already here

This is not an empty industrial tract. The filed perimeter sits amid thousands of anonymous residential sites and 17 mapped school and childcare entries within about three miles. Co-located programs count separately; the map labels verification limits.

02

Fire and water readiness are not established

Regional wildfire history and periodically severe drought are documented. Project fire-water, station-level staffing, apparatus, mutual aid, and industrial-response capability remain unverified.

03

The scale-to-jobs tradeoff is stark

The revised JETI filing pairs $2.237 billion of investment with only 25 applicant-projected permanent jobs. The later air application states 1,326 MW of maximum nominal output.

04

The application is public; the final eligibility basis is not

The released filing identifies 48 turbines, six model families, modeled schedules, controls and applicant-calculated emissions. Final stack terms, source-wide enforceable limits, monitoring and TCEQ's written eligibility determination remain unresolved.

Regional ledger

Four filings. One cumulative landscape.

Each project is tracked separately. Regional claims are made only where the combined record supports them.

Explore
Tracked investment$4.08Bapplicant and TDLR filed estimates
Tracked data-center area2.04M+square feet, excluding Pacifico buildings
Indexed sources66primary filings and official references
Critical unknowns8research priorities, not proven harms
CC-001Pending air registration · issuance paused

Pacifico Cedar Creek Generation Facility

A proposed 48-turbine natural-gas generation facility whose August air application states 1,326 MW of maximum nominal output. An earlier JETI filing described 710 MW of site-rated redundant power supporting approximately 490 MW of associated IT load; the differing capacity measures have not been reconciled in the released record.

Applicants named in filings
Pacifico CCK Energy 1 LLC (air) / Pacifico Cedar Creek LLC (JETI)
Filed location
382 Earl Callahan Road, Cedar Creek, Texas
Scale
~2,842 acres stated; listed parcels total ~2,810 acres
Filed cost
$2.237B applicant projection
TCEQ lists Registration 185019 / Project 413471 as pending, checked October 1, 2026. Its tracking table lists a deficiency cycle opened September 9 with no completion date shown. Governor Abbott’s September 21 directive pauses TCEQ permit issuance for data-center projects pending ERCOT’s review. The project has not been canceled, and the pause does not establish a restart date. Lost Pines Watch’s September 3 meeting account reports that Aqua’s September 1 vote moved Pacifico’s request into non-standard service agreement negotiations. A final executed agreement has not been verified. Aqua’s October 1 agenda index says September minutes await approval at the October board meeting.
Open primary record
FM535-001Registered occupant; opening unverified

EdgeConneX AU02 / AUS02 Data Center

A filed two-story, fully sprinklered data center with site improvements. The qualifying-large-data-center register names CoreWeave as occupant and DFW33220N Operations 1 as operator.

Owner of record
DFW33220N, LLC
Filed location
8001 Wolf Lane, Building 2 / 6752 FM 535, Cedar Creek
Scale
578,000 sq ft
Filed cost
$440M filed estimate
The Texas Comptroller names CoreWeave as the registered occupant. Earlier reporting projected an August 2026 opening. Lost Pines Watch has not independently confirmed commercial operation as of October 1; the projected date is not proof that the building opened.
Open primary record
FM535-002TDLR project registered

EDCAUS11 Data Center

A planned one-story data center with supporting office space, site improvements, and automatic sprinklers.

Owner of record
Burr Computer Environment Inc.
Filed location
6682 FM 535, Cedar Creek
Scale
~730,000 sq ft
Filed cost
$700M filed estimate
TDLR lists Burr Computer Environment Inc. as owner of record. No tenant is assigned in the filing.
Open primary record
FM535-003TDLR project registered

EDCAUS12 Data Center

A second planned one-story data center at the same filed address, with supporting office space, site improvements, and automatic sprinklers.

Owner of record
Burr Computer Environment Inc.
Filed location
6682 FM 535, Cedar Creek
Scale
~730,000 sq ft
Filed cost
$700M filed estimate
TDLR lists Burr Computer Environment Inc. as owner of record. No tenant is assigned in the filing.
Open primary record
What the latest records establish

The project is further along—and key dependencies remain unresolved

The strongest new findings are separated into verified government records, independent calculations, and status checks.

Explore
CLM-012 · Construction stormwaterVerified government record

Black Chamber Partners and Pacifico CCK Energy 1 hold active construction-stormwater authorizations covering 304 and 173.54 acres respectively at the shared B&W Ranch regulated site.

Next evidence: Obtain both complete NOIs, Black Chamber’s July 15 Notice of Change, and every SWP3 map, civil sheet, grading plan, and drainage plan in agency or county possession.

CLM-014 · Water serviceLPW meeting account; final agreement unverified

Aqua’s June and August tabling decisions are historical. LPW’s September 3 meeting account reports that the September 1 vote moved Pacifico’s request into NSSA negotiations. Final executed service terms have not been verified.

Next evidence: Obtain the approved September 1 minutes, Resolution 26.09.01, negotiated NSSA, current engineering findings, cost allocation and final Board action. The October 6 agenda includes approval of the September minutes.

CLM-016 · Public subsidyIndependent cross-check

The original JETI filing sought 100% Chapter 312 abatements from Bastrop County, ESD No. 1, and ESD No. 3 for 2029–2038, together with a ten-year Bastrop ISD taxable-value limitation. The released filings do not publish a consolidated, reproducible total for the requested relief. County records confirm the Chapter 312 requests were withdrawn; Pacifico says it also withdrew JETI J0049.

Next evidence: Obtain both county applications, draft agreements, eligible-value schedules, fiscal reviews, final rates, and the data-center-side incentive model.

CLM-019 · Air-permit statusVerified pending registration

TCEQ lists Registration 185019 / Project 413471 as pending, checked October 1, 2026. Its tracking table lists a deficiency cycle opened September 9 with no completion date shown. Governor Abbott’s September 21 directive pauses TCEQ permit issuance for data-center projects pending ERCOT’s review. The project has not been canceled, and the pause does not establish a restart date.

Next evidence: Obtain the current operative application, deficiency correspondence and written eligibility analysis; track any decision notice and verify applicable challenge instructions with TCEQ. The requested public meeting was declined September 17.

Known / unknown

We do not fill gaps with certainty

The released application supplies a turbine count and model-family inventory, but major engineering and compliance questions remain. Those gaps are a reason to investigate and withhold judgment—not permission to invent a final layout, duty cycle, water demand, or risk conclusion.

Explore
Review all open questions
CriticalTurbinesHow will the released 48-unit inventory, rating bases, modeled schedules, and any later project changes be reconciled in the final approval?
CriticalAirStack heights, locations, exit conditions, annual hours, and modeled receptors?
CriticalWaterAqua WSC service, groundwater wells, or a hybrid supply—and what annual demand?
CriticalFireFire-water storage, pump redundancy, hydrants, apparatus access, and suppression design?
CriticalEmergency responseWhich agency responds, with what staffing, apparatus, industrial capability, and mutual aid?