Independent public-interest researchEvidence verified through July 26, 2026
Lost PinesInfrastructure Observatory
Evidence explorer

Every public claim should have a visible path back to evidence.

Search the current record by project, topic, classification, or source. Source type and claim status are separate so an official filing is not mistaken for independent proof of every assertion inside it.

Current repository

Claims, findings, sources, and unknowns

A claim can link to more than one document and more than one exact page finding. The next-evidence field makes each conclusion falsifiable.

CLM-001 · Project scale · Pacifico Cedar Creek

The filings describe 710 MW of site-rated redundant generation and approximately 490 MW of associated IT load.

Verified filing contentConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0001, DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-001, FND-002, FND-014

What would strengthen or change this

Confirm final configuration, allocation, export capability, and interconnection in permit and commercial records.

CLM-002 · Turbines and controls · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Pacifico proposes multiple simple-cycle gas turbines with SCR and CO oxidation-catalyst controls, plus fast-start peaking turbines.

Applicant statementConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0001

Page findings

FND-002, FND-006, FND-008

What would strengthen or change this

Determine manufacturer, model, count, ratings, stack geometry, operating hours, and enforceable emissions limits.

CLM-003 · Cumulative development · Regional

The concentration of AUS02, EDCAUS11, EDCAUS12, and Pacifico indicates an emerging data-center and energy-infrastructure corridor along FM 535.

Engineering inferenceConfidence: Medium
Source records

DOC-0002, DOC-0003, DOC-0004, DOC-0008

Page findings

None yet

What would strengthen or change this

Identify related campuses, substations, pipelines, utility upgrades, water demands, and backup-generation permits.

CLM-004 · Wildfire · Regional

Authoritative state sources document severe wildfire history and fuels capable of extreme behavior in the Lost Pines region.

Verified general conditionConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0005, DOC-0006, DOC-0007

Page findings

None yet

What would strengthen or change this

Overlay verified project geometry with authoritative fuels, winds, historic fire perimeters, roads, and community receptors.

CLM-005 · Emergency response · Regional

Local industrial and wildfire response capacity may be constrained by the scale and concentration of proposed development.

Open hypothesisConfidence: Unknown
Source records

None yet

Page findings

None yet

What would strengthen or change this

Obtain jurisdiction, staffing, apparatus, response-time, foam, mutual-aid, and pre-incident-planning records.

CLM-006 · Project characterization · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Supplement 1 limits Pacifico’s JETI project to the gas-fired generation facility and excludes the separately described data center from qualified investment and property.

Verified filing contentConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-012, FND-013, FND-014

What would strengthen or change this

Test the asserted separation against ownership, affiliate, contract, site-plan, and behind-the-meter electrical records.

CLM-007 · JETI compelling factor · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Pacifico says the Bastrop investment depends on JETI and Chapter 312 incentives, but the public supplement does not disclose the comparative financial evidence needed to independently test that claim.

Applicant statementConfidence: Medium
Source records

DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-015

What would strengthen or change this

Obtain non-confidential Comptroller correspondence and independently reconstruct the competing-site comparison.

CLM-008 · Ohio alternative · Pacifico Cedar Creek

On the public record, Muhlenberg Township is a paused and contingent possibility rather than a presently actionable competing site.

Engineering inferenceConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-016

What would strengthen or change this

Archive the moratorium, minutes, zoning records, site-control evidence, and any proof of a binding competing offer.

CLM-009 · Economic revisions · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Supplement 1 retains 25 permanent jobs but reduces estimated starting annual permanent payroll from about $6.2 million to about $3.5 million.

Independent cross-checkConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0001, DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-018, FND-019, FND-020, FND-021, FND-022, FND-023

What would strengthen or change this

Reconcile every changed assumption and distinguish incentive-adjusted collections from the no-incentive projection.

CLM-010 · Current JETI law · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Government Code §403.609(b)(3) still requires the Comptroller to find that an agreement is a compelling factor and that the investment would not occur in Texas without it.

Verified legal recordConfidence: High
Source records

LAW-0001, LAW-0002

Page findings

None yet

What would strengthen or change this

Track any future statutory change; do not treat failed SB 2322 as enacted law.

CLM-011 · Air-permit integrity · Pacifico Cedar Creek

Texas reporting and EPA guidance make full-buildout disclosure and source aggregation a necessary decision gate; this is a statewide permitting precedent, not evidence that Pacifico has already used permit segmentation.

Independent cross-checkConfidence: High
Source records

DOC-0009, DOC-0010, DOC-0001, DOC-0008

Page findings

FND-008, FND-014

What would strengthen or change this

Obtain the complete Pacifico air-authorization record and determine how all turbines, generators, affiliated operations, and co-located load are treated.