BlackChamber Group is a private real-estate investment manager and data-center developer. TMRS reports commitments to two BlackChamber funds. Separately, TCEQ lists Black Chamber Partners as the Cedar Creek construction-stormwater operator. No cited public record shows that either fund finances Cedar Creek. Bastrop County confirms the Chapter 312 withdrawals; Pacifico separately reports withdrawing JETI. The project, air registration, and Aqua water-service request remain active.
BlackChamber Group pools money from institutional investors—including public retirement systems—into private funds. Its business is to secure land and power, develop “powered shell” campuses for large technology tenants, lease them, and eventually sell the real estate. It is the developer and investment manager—not the still-secret company that would fill the buildings with servers.
Read BlackChamber's official SEC filingTMRS reports $50 million and $100 million commitments to two BlackChamber real-estate funds.
No cited public record shows that either TMRS-backed fund finances Cedar Creek.
TCEQ lists Black Chamber Partners as the construction-stormwater operator.
Bastrop County confirms two Chapter 312 withdrawals on August 19. Pacifico separately says it withdrew JETI J0049; no Comptroller withdrawal disposition has been located. The Aqua water-service request and air registration remain active.
If Cedar Creek is built, its local effects could include water demand, air emissions, noise, traffic, wildfire and emergency-response risk. The public record supports examining those effects; it does not show that TMRS-backed capital finances this particular project.
The released sources cited here do not include BlackChamber’s site-selection rationale. The analysis below is an inference from Pacifico’s filings, the construction record, Texas land-use law, and the public decisions that remain after the confirmed Chapter 312 withdrawals and Pacifico’s reported JETI withdrawal.
Pacifico describes roughly 2,842 acres. Construction-stormwater authorizations already cover 304 acres on the data-center side and 173.54 acres on the power side—one of the first regulatory steps toward clearing, grading, excavation, and drainage work, not approval of the finished facilities.
Pacifico’s air application identifies 48 gas turbines with 1,326 MW of stated maximum nominal output. Earlier JETI materials described 710 MW of site-rated redundant power supporting approximately 490 MW of IT load; the public filings do not reconcile those figures.
Because the site is outside a city, Bastrop County cannot use broad municipal-style zoning. Tax, water, road, fire, drainage, and environmental decisions become the main public checkpoints.
Bastrop County confirms that two Chapter 312 applications were withdrawn August 19. Pacifico separately says it withdrew JETI J0049; no Comptroller withdrawal disposition has been located. The project remains active, and Aqua water service, roads, emergency capacity, environmental permitting, and any future public assistance still affect the development path.
Large acreage. Dedicated power. Proximity to Austin. Limited county zoning. Withdrawn subsidy requests. An anticipated, still-unnamed data-center customer. BlackChamber's SEC materials describe a business model of developing investable data-center assets that can be leased or sold. Whether Cedar Creek follows that model in this exact form remains unverified. Cedar Creek is also an existing community, not merely an investment thesis.